Jane Espenson explains it all

Via Fluxblog, ex-Buffy and Gilmore Girls writer Jane Espenson analyzes a spate of not getting it regarding the sorry not all that funny joke Sarah Silverman made at Britney Spears’ expense. (BTW: if Britney was “fat,” I’m the Pope.)

Syntactic reanalysis: it’s not just for breakfast any more. I do wish, though, she’d included as an example one of my favorites of this type – the “punchline” to “Lola”: “Well I’m not the world’s most masculine man, but I know what I am, and I’m glad I’m a man – and so’s Lola.”



Filed under langwich, noiselike, TV, webbities

2 responses to “Jane Espenson explains it all

  1. Joe

    Actually, you’re sort of guilty of the same thing Jane’s targets are. The “Lola” line is “I know what I am, and what I am is a man/And so is Lola”. While there’s not as much of a disparity as in the examples Jane uses, well, it *is* different – not as much emphasis on heterosexuality.

  2. Matthew

    Meh. The Silverman stuff was so unfunny I’ve ruined all chances of my wife letting me rent her movie.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s